More Taqiyya from Faith Matters under a new name – Muslims Against Anti-Semitism

Well, well. Not content with painting Muslims as perpetual victims through the medium of Tell Mama UK, the “umbrella” organisation of Faith Matters (through the direction of Fiyaz “Fizzy Bollocks” Mughal, the Mendacious Grievance-Mongering Taqiyya-Artist-In-Chief) has created a new group – obviously with the intention to dispel the notion that Islam has something to do with the rampant anti-Semitism coming from the Muslim community in Western countries in general, and in the UK in particular.

Because as everyone knows, or should know, according to Fiyaz Mughal – that Islam has nothing – nothing whatsoever – to do with anti-Semitism or indeed any of the numerous manifest evils currently being inflicted on non-Muslims by Muslims acting in the name of Allah, and if you should dare to think otherwise, well, then you are nothing but a greasy Islamophobe, not to mention “far-right”, “bigoted” and “racist.”

What race is Islam again? I keep forgetting.

This new group is called Muslims against Anti-Semitism (MAAS) and they have taken out extensive media advertising in the UK in order to pull the wool over the eyes of non-Muslims concerning the verses in the Koran that disparage Jews and command Muslims to hate those of the Jewish faith.

The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); they fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); they claim that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); they love to listen to lies (5:41); they disobey Allah and never observe his commands (5:13). They are disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more. They are under Allah’s curse (9:30), and Muslims should wage war against them and subjugate them under Islamic hegemony (9:29).

This is quite apart from the fact that hating ALL non-Muslims (Jews or otherwise) is commanded in Islamic scripture through the doctrine of Al-Walaa wal-Baraa.

  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ – (Allegiance and Disassociation) is an Islamic doctrine that is very similar to apartheid.
  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ is an ‘essential doctrine’ (usul ud-deen). ‘Essential’ means that all Muslims must believe and practice al Walaa wal Baraa as a condition of being admitted to paradise.
  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ is a highly developed, well-supported and canonical part of Islam approved by the consensus of Islamic jurists.
  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ is legally binding and obligatory upon all Muslims.
  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ is precisely defined by Islamic jurists and is not a nebulous idea
  • ‘Al Walaa wal Baraa’ is an official Islamic doctrine and considered the second most important doctrine in Islam.

Muslims against Anti-Semitism? I don’t think so, Fiyaz. Enough of the Taqiyya already. If you are a devout Muslim then you MUST by necessity hate for the sake of Allah, that is, to hate everyone non-Muslim and / or everything non-Islamic (this is the doctrine of al-Walaa wal-Baraa.) The logical corollary to this is that you CANNOT be considered to be a true Muslim if you do not hate everyone and everything that is non-Muslim and / or non-Islamic.

Any Muslim who wishes to live side-by-side with non-Muslims as equals, in perpetuity (that is to say, not just until the Muslims are strong enough in number to wage jihad against the non-Muslims) should follow the path of intellectual honesty and renounce Islam in its entirety. It is a barbaric, totalitarian ideology with absolutely zero benefit to Western civilisation.

Some Muslims do just that, and apostasise from Islam, at great risk to themselves, it has to be said. The penalty for apostasy under Islam is death, which is why we don’t see more Muslims apostasise, at least in public. In fact, Sheikh al-Qaradawi, the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, stated in 2013 that “If it were not for the death sentence for apostasy, Islam would have ceased to exist a thousand years ago.”

But don’t try and kid us that Islam has nothing to do with the virulent anti-Semitism that has arisen wherever Muslims have become more than a tiny percentage of the population. Islam has everything to do with it, and it has everything to do with Islam.

Tim Burton

Please support my fight for justice on appeal – and against the corruption endemic in the British Establishment and the British legal system.

Tim Burton Legal Defence Fund

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat 

 

In order to prevent “radicalisation” in the UK, has the time come to take every single Muslim child into care?

   Top cop gets it (almost)

Almost four years ago, in March 2014, in his position as London Mayor, Boris Johnson suggested that children in danger of radicalisation should be removed from their parents. He was castigated at the time by the Muslim Council of Britain, who warned that his remarks would inflame anti-Muslim feeling (like pretty much everything else does.)

He said (and I quote):

“The law should obviously treat radicalisation as a form of child abuse.”

“It is the strong view of many of those involved in counter-terrorism that there should be a clearer legal position, so that those children who are being turned into potential killers or suicide bombers can be removed into care – for their own safety and for the safety of the public.”

Now a senior police officer, Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley, has suggested virtually the same thing – that children of convicted terrorists should be removed from their parents, in the same way that the children of convicted paedophiles should be removed from their parents.

and also crucially added this statement:

….. If you know parents [who] believe that people of their faith or their belief, should hate everybody else and grow up to kill people, [then] for me those things are equally wicked environments to expose children to.

To be fair to both Boris Johnson and Mark Rowley, it should go without saying that the laudable goal of protecting children should be paramount in every case where there is a risk of them being exposed to a “wicked environment.” However, the logical consequences on following through on such a policy would have ramifications that have almost certainly not been considered by either official in their safeguarding capacity.

You can’t get much more of a “wicked environment” where innocent children are exposed to the core Islamic concept of Al-Walaa wal-Baraa.

This concept, based as it is on on Koran 60:4, instructs all devout Muslims – without exception – that they must have hatred and enmity for everyone and everything non-Muslim. This is not something that a Muslim may “cherry-pick” – it is mainstream Islamic teaching, red in tooth and claw. I challenge anyone reading this article to find a clearer example of a “wicked environment” in which to bring up children.

There is therefore a good argument to be made for a pro-active intervention in almost every case where an innocent child is in danger of being taught just this one core Islamic concept before they are old enough to question it and weigh up the consequences for themselves, and certainly a policy of pro-active intervention should apply if they are British citizens.

Admittedly this policy would put a strain on the capabilities of the police and the social services, and there would be a few grumblings from the Muslim community that would undoubtedly have to be handled in a robust manner, but as they say, no pain no gain. It would have to be worth a try considering that the alternative will almost certainly be civil war and blood on the streets within a generation or two as the Muslim demographic in this country reaches a tipping point. We owe it to our own children, as well as the innocent children currently in the care of Muslim parents, to act now.

Perhaps those officials and others sharing the same misguided mindset of political correctness, multiculturalism and diversity might also reflect that almost every other counter-terrorism policy in this country has proved to be a complete failure, a situation which could and should have been foreseen, as those policies have been based on fantasy and wishful thinking rather than reality.

Don’t take my word for it – I strongly recommend that every non-Muslim should read, comprehend and inwardly digest (as my teachers used to say) every word in The Aqeedah of the Salaf.

We in the enlightened Western world base most of our moral and ethical judgements on Judaeo-Christian teachings, which have served us well over the past two millennia, and which are one hundred and eighty degrees opposed to most of the moral and ethical values of the Islamic world. Any form of child abuse is just plain wrong, and teaching the core concepts of Islam to innocent children before they are old enough to make up their own minds is child abuse beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Tim Burton