Muslim Council of Britain (and Tell Mama UK) whinge to British Army top brass over Tommy Robinson selfie with soldiers

  Counter-Jihad Hero

Friday 12 October 2018 – With nothing better to do than to agitate for yet more appeasement of the Muslim community in the United Kingdom, the Muslim Council of Britain (and Tell Mama UK) have complained to senior British Army officers over the fact that some of their soldiers were photographed with Tommy Robinson at a motorway service station recently.

The self-appointed spokespeople for “the religion of the perpetually offended” apparently went into turbo-whinge-and-whine mode with yet another grievance to add to the ever growing list of What Muslims Are Unhappy About. This – of course  – is only to be expected from this bunch of professional grievance mongers who take every opportunity to promote the cause of the barbaric ideology of Islam over the wishes and considerations of the rest of the British population.

What is unforgivable in this case, though, is the fact that the aforesaid senior British Army officers, instead of telling the self-important panjandrums of the Muslim Council of Britain and Tell Mama UK to take a hike and to stop being so bloody stupid, have instigated disciplinary proceedings against the soldiers and have reportedly dismissed one soldier from the Army as a result.

One of the more senior Ruperts – Major General Rupert Jones, who will shortly take up the appointment of Standing Joint Force Commander, said: “The British Army is absolutely clear that we do not tolerate extremist views and we don’t tolerate extremist behaviour.”

Oh really?

So being patriotic, standing up for your country and supporting British soldiers in the face of unremitting global hostility from the so-called “religion of peace” is now considered extremist behaviour, is it? I am reminded of the words of Rudyard Kipling’s 1890 poem, Tommy:-

For it’s Tommy this, an’ Tommy that, an’ “Chuck him out, the brute!”But it’s “Saviour of ‘is country,” when the guns begin to shoot;

As for “extremist views”, I don’t recall anyone mentioning anything about extremist views when the mealy-mouthed war-mongering traitor Tony Blair was photographed with soldiers of the British Army in Iraq and Afghanistan less than twenty years ago. Arguably the former Labour Prime Minister did more damage to this country with his extremist views than any Prime Minister before or since, and certainly a thousand times worse in terms of endangering national security and reducing the quality of life of British citizens than anything Tommy Robinson might have said or done.

     Warmonger / Traitor

A petition is being organised by The Rebel Media to protest against the unfair treatment and double standards applied to British soldiers for simply choosing to stand and smile for a photograph with Tommy Robinson. The time is coming when we will have every reason to support our lads in the fight against the totalitarian ideology of Islam – an ideology that would convert, enslave or kill every free person not only in this country, but also throughout the world.

Please sign the petition and support our lads in the face of this unwarranted political correctness.

Latest update from Ezra Levant of The Rebel Media – well worth watching if you have an hour to spare – includes a recruitment video from the British Army about 18-20 minutes in, a recruitment video which probably goes a long way to explaining why the British Army is having so much difficulty in recruiting and retaining patriotic soldiers and service personnel.

 

Tim Burton

PS – I am still some way short of being able to cover the legal costs incurred in my quest to overturn my unjust conviction and to have my application to punish Dr Matthew Wilkinson for Contempt of Court properly processed by the British Justice System.

Please donate whatever you can to my Legal Defence Fund:

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

Many thanks,

Tim Burton

 

 

Tommy Robinson released from HMP Onley – tells MSM reporters “all you do is lie to the British people”

Tommy Robinson freed

Wednesday 01 August 2018 – Following the judgement handed down by Lord Chief Justice Burnett at the Royal Courts of Justice earlier today, Tommy Robinson has been freed from HMP Onley and had a few choice words for waiting mainstream media (MSM) reporters.

Tommy singled out a Sky News reporter as a microphone was thrust under his nose and he was asked “do you have any regrets?”

It seems like a fair question when taken out of context, but considering that the MSM have gone out of their way to demonise him and to put his life and the lives of his family in danger, one can fully understand Tommy’s reply – “Why would I have anything to say to you – all you do is lie. You’ve lost the faith of the British public.”

Report from Sky News here:

Report from ITV News here:

Report from BBC News here:

For an unbiased view of the proceedings, I would highly recommend the reporting by Ezra Levant of The Rebel Media. Ezra has flown over from Canada to attend both appeal hearings and has recorded a series of videos on each occasion.

He was also given permission to live-stream reports from the court via Twitter. I am sure the irony has not been lost on him considering that Tommy Robinson was arrested, charged, tried, sentenced and imprisoned within the space of five hours on Friday 25 May 2018 for what amounts to virtually identical behaviour.

Robert Spencer from Jihad Watch makes the point that Tommy is still being tarred as “anti-Muslim” for opposing jihad terror and sharia law, when in the 1930’s nobody was criticised for being “anti-Nazi” – and there was an obvious distinction between being “anti-Nazi” and “anti-German”.

Arguably Islam is a thousand times worse than Nazism, as we have given it undue protection from criticism on the grounds that it is primarily a “religion”, which is manifestly not the case, as 64% of the Islamic texts can be more accurately described as political rather than religious, which makes Islam primarily a political ideology.

Meanwhile the Koran inspires Muslims – indeed, divinely commands Muslims – to wage war against everyone and everything non-Muslim, and the Establishment and the lying mainstream media do everything they can to cover this up after every jihad attack.

Once the dust has settled, I am sure there will be some public celebrations of Tommy’s release, which was basically an admission by the Lord Chief Justice that proper criminal procedures were not followed in the Leeds Crown Court case, which is what we in the counter-jihad movement have been saying all along.

If anyone out there thinks that such an idea has merit, I would be willing to re-record the music video “Counter Jihad Hero” in a professional setting with professional music artists for broadcast at future events. I am not looking for any payment for my time, merely for an opportunity to provide a fitting tribute to one of the greatest patriots and public figures of the 21st century.

Tim Burton

Please donate whatever you can afford to my Legal Defence fund:

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

Your contribution will help to overturn an unjust conviction. Thank you.

Tommy Robinson is freed on appeal by the Lord Chief Justice at the Royal Courts of Justice in London – Wednesday 01 August 2018

      Tommy Robinson

This morning, Wednesday 01 August 2018, Tommy Robinson was freed on appeal. He is however on bail to return to Leeds at an unspecified point in the future to have the Contempt of Court case re-heard.

In anticipation of this momentous and historic event, I recorded a music video tribute to Tommy Robinson entitled “Counter Jihad Hero” – with the following comments:

In recording this video, I anticipated a successful appeal for Tommy Robinson on Wednesday 01 August at the Royal Courts of Justice in London – and indeed it was successful, as Tommy is now out on bail. However he still has to return to Leeds at an unspecified date to have the Contempt of Court hearing re-heard, so some of the lyrics are not quite as accurate as they might be. But I am putting the video out there for your comments anyway. And yes, I know my singing sounds like a cat being strangled, so you needn’t point that out to me.
YouTube has made a valiant attempt at subtitling the lyrics through the “Closed Caption” button but has obviously given up in disgust half way through. If time permits I will add my own subtitles but in the meantime I can only apologise if the lyrics are not as clear as they should be.

Lyrics to “Counter Jihad Hero”

Counter-Jihad Hero

Written by Tim Burton © Copyright 2018

Verse One:

His name is Tommy Robinson / he’s a lad from Luton Town

The Establishment can’t stand him, but he’ll never let us down

He’s a counter-jihad hero / and he’s endured a world of pain

But now they’ve had to let him out, he’ll Make Britain Great Again!

(Chorus)

And we’ll have another Day for Freedom before the year is out

We’ll show them that we’ll never accept defeat

Another Day for Freedom and this time there is no doubt

We’ll make those brick walls rumble – we’ll make those brick walls crumble

Oh, we’ll make those brick walls tumble in Downing Street!

Verse Two:

Now Tommy was in Leeds in May / live-streaming his report

When seven burly coppers pounced and dragged him to the court

They sentenced him to thirteen months but it was a bad idea

‘Cos now the counter-jihad movement’s getting into gear!

(Chorus)

And we’ll have another Day for Freedom before the year is out

We’ll show them that we’ll never accept defeat

Another Day for Freedom and this time there is no doubt

We’ll make those brick walls rumble – we’ll make those brick walls crumble

Oh, we’ll make those brick walls tumble in Downing Street!

Verse Three:

At the Royal Courts in London Town / his case it was re-tried

The Lord Chief Justice said – My son, you can leave this court with pride

You’re a counter-jihad hero / you’re free to go campaign

And summon every patriot – to Make Britain Great Again!

(Chorus)

And we’ll have another Day for Freedom before the year is out

We’ll show them that we’ll never accept defeat

Another Day for Freedom and this time there is no doubt

We’ll make those brick walls rumble – we’ll make those brick walls crumble

Oh, we’ll make those brick walls tumble in Downing Street!

Verse Four:

His name is Tommy Robinson / he’s a lad from Luton Town

The Establishment can’t stand him, but he’ll never let us down

He’s a counter-jihad hero / and all the people say

He’s going to be Prime Minister, so watch out Theresa May!

(Chorus)

And we’ll have another Day for Freedom before the year is out

We’ll show them that we’ll never accept defeat

Another Day for Freedom and this time there is no doubt

We’ll make those brick walls rumble – we’ll make those brick walls crumble

Oh, we’ll make those brick walls tumble in Downing Street!

© Copyright 2018 – Tim Burton

Please donate whatever you can afford to my Legal Defence fund:

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

Your contribution will help to overturn an unjust conviction.

Free Tommy Robinson – Demonstration at Whitehall on Saturday 14 July 2018

 Peppa Pig causes a kerfuffle

Saturday 14 July saw yet another massive demonstration outside the gates of Downing Street. Patriots from every walk of life streamed into Whitehall to protest the unjust imprisonment of Tommy Robinson, who was jailed for a disproportionate 13 months following his arrest, charge, trial and conviction in the space of three hours on Friday 25 May – a process which would be unworthy of a kangaroo court in a banana republic.

There were a handful of so-called “Antifa” counter-protesters, who were safely corralled at the other end of Whitehall, holding up placards with the same tired and worn-out phrases that we have seen so many times before. Placards with phrases such as “Racists”, “Nazis”, “Islamophobes” and of course “Fascists” were displayed in abundance – all the while the real Fascists were wailing and gnashing their teeth at being unable to effectively counter the enormous demonstration of support for Tommy.

Despite the vilification of Tommy Robinson by the Left and in the MSM (the biased mainstream media) polls suggest that two-thirds of the British public think that he not only should not have been jailed, but also that the entire process was fundamentally flawed and desperately in need of review.

Once again, tens of thousands of loyal supporters turned up on a warm and sunny July afternoon to hear speeches from many prominent politicians (such as Gerard Batten, the current leader of UKIP and a man who really “gets” Islam and the numerous problems associated with its unwelcome presence in our country.)

The video of Gerard Batten’s speech can be found here.

It is an incredibly powerful speech and even if you do nothing else today, I would urge you to watch and listen to it in its entirety. Just how powerful can be gauged from the reported response of the snowflakes on the Left of the political spectrum, who have been clutching handkerchiefs to their collective bosom and reaching for the smelling salts.

There was also a very inspiring speech from Geert Wilders, which had to be presented via a video link as our government shamefully declined to provide any security for his intended visit on the day of the demonstration, and also would not allow his armed Dutch security detail to provide protection. Given that Geert Wilders has had to live with 24/7 security for the past decade, due to the ever-present threat of death from rabid Muslims, the governments’s position on this matter is indefensible.

The video of Geert Wilders’ speech can be found here.

There was also a speech given (via video link) from Malcolm Lord Pearson of Rannoch, who is a lone voice in the House of Lords protesting against the Islamisation of our country. In recent days, his call for investigations into the hate speech spewed from all too many mosques and Islamic institutions has been met with accusations from Their Lordships of – wait for it – “hate speech.” You couldn’t make it up.

The video of Lord Pearson’s speech can be found here.

There were many other speeches from politicians in France, Sweden and Germany – and an impassioned speech from Kev Carroll, the cousin of Tommy Robinson, who has been a steadfast supporter of Tommy for many years. The entire event was very professionally hosted by Raheem Kassam, the former editor-in-chief of Breitbart News London, who did an excellent job of controlling the crowd and explaining that the police were only there to protect them (although I’m not sure that I entirely agree with that.)

It is at this point that I must explain the significance of the Peppa Pig photo at the top of this article. The photograph was taken during an element of high drama during the afternoon’s proceedings, and I was there personally to witness what happened.

A woman in the crowd had obviously decided to express her disapproval of Sadiq “Saracen” Khan (the current Mayor of London who is manifestly unfit to hold mayoral office with his support for radical Islamist groups) and hoisted aloft a helium-filled Peppa Pig balloon with the likeness of Sadiq Khan attached to it.

Now, what with Sadiq “Saracen” Khan being a Muslim and all, there was always a possibility that some Muslim, somewhere in the world, would become offended (they don’t call Islam the Religion of the Perpetually Offended for nothing, you know.) This prompted a dozen or so police officers to force their way into the crowd mob-handed to try and arrest the woman in question. The incident even prompted a contingent of mounted police officers to drive their horses into the crowd, which I personally felt was an unnecessary provocation in the face of what was essentially a peaceful protest.

During the scuffle, where many patriots who were surrounding the woman chanted “Shame on you! Shame on you!” towards the police – the balloon miraculously escaped the clutches of the police as it was passed from hand to hand through the crowd. Every now and then it would reappear, hovering above the crowd, tethered with a bit of colourful ribbon, and eventually the police gave up trying to retrieve it.

This could well add fuel to the fire of “Balloon Wars” where patriots have rightfully mocked the current Mayor of London for his support of a Trump blimp at a recent anti-Trump protest in London. They do say that “what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander” – and even Michael Fabricant, the Conservative MP for Lichfield, has got in on the action.

      Balloon Wars

Far be it from me to suggest that the display of numerous Peppa Pig balloons should become “de rigueur” at future patriotic events, balloons adorned with not only the likeness of Sadiq “Saracen” Khan, but perhaps also with the likeness of Fiyaz “Fizzy Bollocks” Mughal, the founder and Mendacious Grievance-Mongering Taqiyya-Artist-In-Chief of Tell Mama UK. The presence of hundreds, if not thousands of these balloons would undoubtedly complement the usual array of patriotic flags on display at such an event, although it would also no doubt be misrepresented as “racist”, “bigoted” and “Islamophobic” by the biased mainstream media.

But I digress.

An appeal has been scheduled for Wednesday 18 July at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, and I intend to be there to report on it in person. The mainstream media can no longer be trusted to give accurate and unbiased information to the public, and it now falls to citizen journalists to present the truths that our political elites find inconvenient.

I am sure you will all join me in hoping and praying for a favourable outcome for Tommy Robinson, a much-maligned true British hero who has been unjustly treated by the Establishment in their clumsy attempts to cover-up the scandal of Islamic Grooming gangs and other manifestations of the presence of Islam – a barbaric, totalitarian political ideology which (in my humble opinion) has no place in any civilised Western country.

Tim Burton

Please donate whatever you can afford to my Legal Defence fund:

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

Your contribution will help to overturn an unjust conviction.

Patriots On Trial – John Banks takes on the system at Doncaster Magistrates Court

  Justice in Doncaster

On Wednesday 04 July I attended a civil hearing at Doncaster Magistrates Court, where a prominent patriot and political activist, John Banks, was fighting to defend his freedom to protest against the Islamisation of our country.

He was also there to defend his right to forcefully criticise government policies – and to criticise those organs of the state complicit in perpetuating those policies whilst at the same time trying to cover-up a well-orchestrated programme of enormous injustice against the British people.

I have known John a long time, both as a political activist and as a friend, and I have long felt that the systematic persecution of such patriots and political activists should be reported on and openly discussed so that “we the people” can realise the extent that the State will go to suppress the righteous indignation of ordinary citizens who see what is unfolding right in front of them and who wish to warn others of the inevitable outcome, which may well extend to civil war on our streets within a generation.

John Banks has a long and honourable history of standing up and saying the things that the State would rather not have said or broadcast. I have attended several events where John has given powerful and impassioned speeches concerning not only the Islamisation of our country, but the attempted cover-up of one of the most outrageous scandals of our time – the rape and trafficking of thousands of our young and vulnerable children by predatory Muslim rape gangs – or as the media would say – “grooming gangs” as detailed in the 2014 book “Easy Meat” by Peter McLoughlin.

Needless to say, John has had to contend with some of the worst things that the State has been able to throw at him, and on this occasion he was required to appear before Deputy District Judge Russell in a civil hearing to determine whether he should be jailed for breaching the terms of an ASBO.

An ASBO is short for an Anti-Social Behaviour Order. These were originally devised to deal with children and teenagers whose rowdiness occasionally got out of hand, and rather than to subject them to the full criminal court process, it would deal with behaviour that “caused -or was capable of causing – harm, harassment, alarm or distress to any person.”

“Any person.” Not “any reasonable person.”

Any person who was, or could have possibly been, or who could claim to have been “alarmed or distressed” by the actions of John Banks or any other individual, could have his complaint dealt with via a legal process resulting in an Anti-Social Behaviour Order. It is not difficult to see how easily this process could be abused to suppress thoroughly justified and politically motivated protests by patriots such as John Banks.

On this occasion at Doncaster Magistrates Court, the police were trying to argue that John was in breach of an ASBO issued when he made a political protest that was deemed not to have met evidential standards that would have justified criminal charges.

This was serious. If John had been found to be in breach of his ASBO, he could be facing six months to two years imprisonment, and this was at a time when various political activists such as Jayda Fransen, Paul Golding and Tommy Robinson had recently been jailed on various trumped-up charges – all of which fell into the category of “activities that make the State look bad when it has become obvious that the State has become derelict in its primary duty of keeping its citizens safe.”

On the morning of Wednesday 04 July, the police opened their case by playing some CCTV recordings of John Banks speaking at various rallies in Manchester, Rotherham and Sunderland. There were snorts of derision from the public gallery when it became obvious that the police prosecutor was unable to get to grips with the “ClickLink” video system designed to communicate CCTV recordings to everyone in the courtroom, and even  more so when the bundles of documents comprising the evidence against John were presented to the judge, as they were hopelessly disorganised.

Eventually the police prosecutor had to resort to playing the CCTV recordings on his laptop, once to the judge, and once to the defence counsel and the rest of us in the public gallery. Full marks for improvisation, I suppose, although one could easily see that the judge was not impressed.

The CCTV recordings admittedly showed John using “colourful” language to denounce the Islamisation of our country, and to denounce the predatory behaviour of increasing numbers of Islamic grooming gangs.

He was also very scathing concerning the seeming inability of the police, social services and government to effectively deal with the increasing problems that have been caused over the last 20-30 years as a result.

However, at no time was John seen to be inciting murder or mayhem, and he was careful to draw a distinction between Muslims as people and the ideology of Islam itself. He only said what many of us already knew – that if things kept going the way they were, then we were headed for very dark times indeed, and that we were now in a perilous situation that could have easily been avoided if only the State had not been guilty of gross dereliction of duty in its failure to keep its citizens safe.

After much discussion back and forth between the police prosecutor and the judge, it eventually transpired that one of the CCTV recordings was missing. A courier was dispatched to track down the errant CCTV recording and in the meantime the trial was momentarily postponed.

During the break I was able to chat with John Morley, who was acting as an advocate for John Banks. I told him that I wished that I had had him representing me at my trial at Southwark Crown Court in 2017. He would have made short work of Fiyaz “Fizzy Bollocks” Mughal in the courtroom.

Eventually the errant CCTV recording was delivered to Judge Russell and the case resumed. The police prosecutor argued that John had been obstructing the police in their duty of arresting Jayda Fransen at a public rally, however Judge Russell appeared to acknowledge the argument put forward by the defence that on the contrary, the CCTV recording showed that John was merely trying to have Jayda escorted through the crowd towards the police lines in a safe manner, and that there was no attempt to obstruct the police.

Despite our initial forebodings, Judge Russell found that although John Banks’ actions undoubtedly constituted “behaviour causing, or capable of causing harm, harassment, alarm or distress to any person” under the current wording of the Act relating to Anti-Social Behaviour Orders, the case was not strong enough to allow the police to exercise their “powers of arrest” in this instance.

Not only that, but as the original ASBO had come with no time restrictions, the Judge set a limitation of twelve months for the duration of the ASBO. There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth from the police prosecutor, who having seen defeat snatched from the jaws of victory in terms of having John summarily arrested, had argued that the ASBO should at the very least have been kept in place for an extended period of time.

I was pleased -as I am sure most of John’s numerous supporters who were present at the hearing were pleased -to see John emerge from the Court a free man (albeit with a twelve-month restriction on his political activities.)

In my opinion both John Banks and his advocate John Morley deserve medals for heroism in the face of the enemy, although I doubt whether our current spineless Prime Minister Theresa May would agree. We will probably not see a nomination for Lord Banks of Doncaster any time soon. However, the battle to save our country continues, and as the old Buddhist saying has it – “Never underestimate the power of one drop of water. On its own it may seem insignificant, but over time it will wear away the biggest stone, or fill the largest ocean.”

Tim Burton

Please donate whatever you can afford to my Legal Defence fund:

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

Your contribution will help to overturn an unjust conviction.

 

 

Shock horror – Pro-Brexit demonstration in London largely unreported by mainstream media

   We want Brexit

On Saturday 23 June 2018, tens of thousands of patriotic Britons marched from Victoria Station to the Conservative Party headquarters in Millbank, London. The objective was to show the strength of feeling concerning the fact that the anticipated exit from the EU – following the Brexit referendum from exactly two years ago – has been extremely badly handled by this government, and we are now rapidly heading towards a scenario of “no deal” with the European Union due to a combination of intransigence and unreasonable demands from the negotiating team on the EU side, and a distinct impression of incompetence coupled with a general unwillingness to confront the problems and exploit our strong negotiating position from the British side.

For make no mistake, we do have an extremely strong negotiating position insofar as the EU have a lot more to lose from Brexit than we do, and there is no need for us to be offering the EU tens of billions of pounds for the privilege of leaving behind this corrupt bureaucratic system and its waste, inefficiency, and profligate disregard for the wishes of ordinary European citizens.

I was privileged to be there myself, on what turned out to be a warm and sunny Saturday afternoon in London. After the march from Victoria to Millbank with all the other patriots, I saw and heard for myself the passionate speeches delivered by the UKIP leader Gerard Batten, the For Britain leader Anne-Marie Waters, and many other speakers including Luke Nash-Jones of MBGA, the ex-Muslim Shazia Hobbs, who had some choice things to say about Tell Mama UK, and last but not least the founder of “Justice 4 Our Boys”, Tracy Blackwell.

The enthusiasm of patriots was everywhere on display, and there were flags and banners from many patriotic groups including MBGA (Make Britain Great Again) and UKFM (United Kingdom Freedom Movement). There was also a strong presence from the VAT (Veterans against Terrorism) and the DFLA (Democratic Football Lads Alliance) who have organised several events throughout the country over the past 12 months, with an emphasis on protests against Islamic terrorism and more recently, the unjust imprisonment of Tommy Robinson on a Contempt of Court charge.

There have been many videos of the event uploaded to YouTube, and I have included a link to one of them here.  You can see for yourselves that the demonstrators numbered in the tens of thousands.

There was also an anti-Brexit demonstration taking place in London on the same day, and the most striking thing for me was the media coverage given to these two events. The mainstream media focused almost exclusively on the anti-Brexit demonstration in Parliament Square, and for the most part ignored the pro-Brexit demonstration altogether.

Here are some typical mainstream media reports from the BBC, the Guardian and the Independent,  all of which have been trying to outdo themselves in “bigging up” the numbers involved on the anti-Brexit side. If you hadn’t been paying attention to the reports from citizen journalists and the alternative media outlets, you would have been left with the impression that while the anti-Brexit event attracted hundreds of thousands of demonstrators (a gross exaggeration belied by aerial photographs taken at the event on the day) – the pro-Brexit demonstrators consisted of merely “hundreds” of “Little Englanders” and “racist, bigoted, Islamophobic and far-right” football hooligans out to cause trouble.

This is sloppy and unprofessional journalism of the worst kind, and while I am not surprised to see the Guardian and the Independent promoting the anti-Brexit point of view, I and many others are rapidly becoming disheartened with, and disappointed in the BBC – who, it should be remembered, was once a beacon of professional and impartial journalism that was respected around the world. Not any more, it would seem.

Admittedly the numbers do not tell the whole story, but the fact remains that a majority (17.4 million people) voted in the UK for Brexit two years ago and since then the EU has increasingly shown its true colours as an unaccountable bureaucratic entity, intent on imposing a globalist federalist structure on the citizens of Europe with an emphasis on destroying nation states through a process of unfettered immigration – coupled with severe penalties for speaking out against this inherently destabilising and undemocratic process.

Already we have seen that in Germany, anyone posting articles on social media that are critical of government and EU policy, especially (but not limited to) immigration and the consequent rise in terrorism, violent crime and anti-social behaviour, are treated as if they were criminals themselves, with draconian fines and jail sentences handed down in order to deter others from speaking out. The European Union elites are pushing for this state of affairs to be implemented throughout Europe by means of the Barcelona Declaration, and more recently the Marrakesh Declaration.

Do we want to be part of this? The people of Britain have spoken – and the answer is a resounding “No!” Although there may be some disruption and perhaps some (limited) financial consequences for leaving the EU, it should be remembered that we were a strong and independent trading nation once, and this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for us to be so once again.

You cannot put a price on sovereignty, independence and the control of our own borders, especially at a time when the EU is descending into tyranny and the global threat from Islamic terror together with the adverse effects of the increasing Islamisation of our countries has never been greater.

It is becoming clear that we cannot trust those in government to deliver the “will of the people” as expressed through the Brexit referendum, and that the mainstream media are complicit in this process. This will not end well – my own prediction is for civil war on our streets within a generation if the “will of the people” is not respected at this critical time in our history.

I do not make this dire prediction lightly, but the chances of obtaining any meaningful result at the ballot box in the time left available to us – before the Muslim demographic reaches a tipping point – are receding day by day, and history has taught us that when the proportion of Muslims in any given population reaches critical mass (which need not necessarily be a majority) then civil conflict is inevitable.

Tim Burton

Here’s why the fate of Tommy Robinson should concern us all – it’s about much more than just one person

     Tommy Robinson

As most of you will know by now, Tommy Robinson was arrested, charged, tried, convicted and imprisoned within the space of five hours on Friday 25 May 2018 on a spurious charge of Contempt of Court. This highly unusual and controversial process was then subjected to a media blackout by order of the judge (although this was later overturned.)

The following day, Saturday 26 May, saw an enormous outpouring of outrage culminating in a demonstration outside Downing Street in London. Many people could not believe that the country that they believed in and loved so passionately could be capable of jailing someone whose primary concern was the preservation of our freedoms, hard-won by our ancestors and forefathers on the fields of battle over the past one thousand years.

Since then, we have had demonstrations all around the world, involving people of every race, creed and colour who have come to realise that our freedoms depend solely upon those who are willing to fight for them, and that if we do not fight for those freedoms when they are threatened, we will find that they have been taken away from us by those who wish merely to preserve their own selfish interests.

The time has come to stand up and say – “No More.” Tommy Robinson MUST be freed, and those who have been complicit in his persecution over the years must be brought to account. This includes not only the treasonous government who would stand by and see our freedoms taken away in order to appease Islam, but also the police and the judiciary who are complicit in the steady drip-drip-drip removal of our freedoms under the guise of “community cohesion” – a phrase which really means “don’t upset the Muslims because their first reaction is to use violence against the rest of us.”

For make no mistake, it is the cowardice of our political elites, the cowardice of our police and judiciary and the cowardice of all the other organs of the state that has allowed this situation to develop.

The problems associated with Islam should have been dealt with robustly thirty or forty years ago, when it was starting to become apparent that many of the followers of Islam were displaying criminal and anti-social tendencies in far greater proportions as a percentage of the population. Instead, they were treated with kid gloves and allowed to get away with behaviour that would never have been tolerated if the perpetrators were not Muslim. At that time, anyone who noticed what was happening and spoke out was either ignored or called a “racist”, “bigot” and “Islamophobe.”

Who now would wish to put their head above the parapet and condemn Islam for the barbaric, totalitarian, anti-democratic seventh-century ideology that it is, if it would result in their losing their job, or being publicly criticised and hounded, maybe even doxxed, and running the risk of imprisonment or worse?

We need to stand up and say with one voice that we will no longer tolerate this state of affairs that will have only one outcome – the enslavement and subjugation of the once-proud people of Britain under the shackles of Islam, aided and abetted by the treasonous left-wing politicians and the mainstream media.

For those of you who think that I am exaggerating, I invite you to look at the template that Islam has used over the past 1400 years to subjugate so many previously proud and free peoples – Hindus and Sikhs in India, Buddhists in Asia, and Christians and Jews in France and Spain (until the 700-year long Reconquista was finally successful in 1492.)

We need a Reconquista of our own, a Reconquista to completely expel Islam from our Judaeo-Christian democratic societies, not only throughout Britain but throughout the whole of Europe. Despite the predictable attempts of the mainstream media to smear him as a “racist”, “bigot” and “Islamophobe”, Tommy Robinson is just the man to lead the charge.

He has the tenacity of the Duke of Wellington and the doggedness of Winston Churchill in the face of adversity, and I exhort you all to support Tommy in whatever way you can, whether it be by demonstrations such as the one planned for Saturday 14 July in Whitehall, or by simply raising awareness among your local communities.

Write to your MP, or perhaps attend their constituency surgeries and remind them that they are there to serve “we the people” rather than to simply line their own pockets. Every MP who cares about freedom should make the freedom of Tommy Robinson one of the top priorities, if not the top priority, on their agenda.

Whatever you do, don’t let Tommy languish in vain in one of Her Majesty’s Prisons, surrounded by Muslims who would kill him without a second thought if they had the opportunity, just because he has spoken out against the depredations of Islam and its tendency to produce large numbers of violent, criminal and anti-social people – people who are commanded by Islamic scripture never to assimilate or integrate into other cultures and communities, and certainly never into our civilised Western communities.

I am sure that most non-Muslims, if they were asked, would say that they would prefer to live in peace with their Muslim neighbours, as equals, in perpetuity. The truth is that Islam simply will not allow this to happen, and every non-Muslim needs to understand this truth, rather than to accept blame from others (or to blame themselves) for not being sufficiently charitable and understanding concerning the all-too-frequent violent, criminal and anti-social behaviour perpetrated by Muslims in our societies.

#FreeTommy

Tim Burton

 

Tommy Robinson supporters climb gates of Downing Street after his arrest and imprisonment – Media silent

      Tommy Robinson

As you will have no doubt heard by now, Tommy Robinson has been arrested and imprisoned following his live coverage of an Islamic grooming gang outside Leeds Crown Court. This is simply wrong on so many levels.

I could comment at length on the dire implications for free speech in this country, but many independent political commentators have already posted articles and video clips on YouTube that explain the situation very well.

For example:

Fahrenheit 211

Info Wars

Ezra Levant

Stefan Molyneux

The Government has issued what is effectively a “D” notice prohibiting the mainstream media from reporting anything related to the arrest of Tommy Robinson and his manifestly unjust imprisonment. By extension, the media are prevented from reporting on the Whitehall / Downing Street protests that took place on Saturday 26 May, and will no doubt be prevented from reporting on the protests that will take place at Speakers Corner on Sunday.

If you are unable to attend the event in London at Speakers Corner, may I suggest that you follow the live blogging and live streaming videos that will inevitably be found on the Internet. The mainstream media will tell us absolutely nothing about what is happening, and even when they consider that a subject may be reported on, they will spin the news to make it look like that the protesters are nothing but a bunch of drunken hooligans out for a good time, rather than the concerned patriots that they really are.

To make matters worse, Facebook and Twitter are shadow-banning any accounts that appear to have a conservative viewpoint. They have been doing this “under the radar” for months, but now it is obvious even to the meanest intelligence that there is a concerted effort to crack down on our freedom of speech and to take away our ability to criticise anything that the Government finds problematic, such as Islam for example.

The Government is terrified of political movements that may rise up and overthrow them – a good example might be of the Poll Tax riots of 1990 – and while I am not suggesting that supporters of Tommy Robinson should instigate riots, I think that everyone of goodwill – that is to say, every non-Muslim and every concerned patriot – should get out onto the streets in large numbers and demonstrate to the Government that enough is enough.

Many people have said to me that the only way to effect change is through the ballot box, but we simply do not have enough time to effect the political change needed by the peaceful democratic means that have been open to us up to now. The Islamisation of this country is advancing like a steamroller – crushing all opposition rather than allowing peaceful and open discussion – and it is aided and abetted by those who would use violence to shut us down.

The hooded thugs of “Antifa” – a misnomer if ever there was one, as they are the most fascist and intolerant bunch of people you are ever likely to come across, and I should know – are being encouraged by the Government to intimidate anyone and everyone with a conservative viewpoint from expressing those views in public. The parallel with Hitler’s Brownshirts in the 1930’s is unmistakable, and it is a recipe for disaster.

Not only that, but many people working in professions such as the police, the National Health Service, local government and education – including, I might add, my own two daughters – have been intimidated and threatened with the loss of their jobs if they dare to express politically incorrect opinions concerning Islam. This stifling of our free speech has to stop now, and the only way to stop it in the time we have left before Islam strangles the life out of our democracy is by direct action, to generate enough momentum so that the Government understands that the depth of feeling in this country will lead to their overthrow if they do not change direction and deal with the numerous and manifest problems that Islam causes.

Islam is not going to stop of its own accord. It cannot be reformed. It cannot be bargained with, or reasoned with. It will not stop until we are all either dead, converted to Islam, or subjugated as dhimmis. It advances using fear, violence, intimidation and terror, and if the demographic does not change then before too long we will see a Muslim majority in this country that will use our democracy to stifle and eventually eliminate democracy itself.

This approach has worked very well for Islam for the last 1400 years, and there is no reason for Islam to change tack when it is following what it sees as a successful strategy. It has to be stopped, by peaceful means if possible, but by force if necessary. We have to stop it for the sake of our children and grandchildren. We owe them that much at least.

I will leave you with the words of John F Kennedy – “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.”

Don’t say you haven’t been warned. And keep Tommy Robinson in your thoughts, as his time in prison is likely to turn out to be a death sentence.

Tim Burton

PS – Please donate whatever you can to my Legal Defence Fund in order that we may overturn my unjust conviction and expose the fraud and corruption in the British Establishment.

Any money left over from a successful appeal will go towards the support of Tommy Robinson and his family.

http://www.paypal.me/followthecat

 

 

In defence of the freedom-loving patriot and activist John Banks, facing persecution at the hands of the State

       John Banks

The trial of John Banks, freedom-lover, patriot and activist, is due to take place on 04 July 2018 at Doncaster. It concerns an ASBO – an anti-social behaviour order – for blasphemy. John has asked for his legal advice to be shared as widely as possible so that people can understand the corrupt way in which our laws are being used against us.

John has also produced a YouTube video concerning the matter.

The legal advice below is rather a long document but it does give an insight into the legal complexities surrounding even such minor enforcement procedures such as an ASBO. If you are able to attend the trial in person on 04 July then please turn up to support John and to support freedom. I will certainly be there myself.

This is my legal advice for you at this time.

Apologies for the messiness of this. I felt I just needed to send it to you as is so it helps you describe your situation to others.

I cover answering your questions about what you are permitted to do and I describe what possible outcomes I envisage from your own personal perspective as well as from our collective perspective.

If the police construe the ASBO as a gagging order then I suggest we contest that interpretation.
Of course they don’t want you talking to voters about what a sham your ASBO is..
It makes them look very corrupt.
They could mitigate the problem by flouting fewer laws instead of demanding you cover for them.

Where I use the term “they” I am normally referring to the judges and prosecuters collectively.
From what I have witnessed at your interim kangaroo hearing the judge appeared to be the judge, prosecuter and principle plaintiff too.
You have caused that judge no end of dismay and alarm by being criticial of Islam and being critical of the police and courts.

Only by imposing a death sentence on you can they adequately balance out the visible trauma that that unfortunate old lunatic imagines he has suffered at your hands.

Our overall strategy for defence can be summed up in one word….
Attack!
That’s usually the best strategy when dealing with cowards.

The prognosis initially looked grim.
It seemed certain this ASBO was merely a formality and then you would get sent down for some ridiculous reason which we all know to be perfectly legal even by their own elastic and inconsistently applied laws.

Now I have had time to look at more of the paperwork and evidence, I can see a pattern of clumsiness in the preparation of the evidence and even in the conduct of the Judge at the interim hearing that invites legal challenges.

It is critical we pay as much attention to how we fight this case in the court of public opinion and otherwise outside of the jurisdiction of the court.
We are little more than spectaters in the court whereas we have a lot more power outside the court.
I may not be allowed to point out all the perjury and mis use of legal powers in the court itself and we may instead have to simply hand them written evidence on the day where the judge will most likely pretend not to read it.

If he stops and reads anything then that might be a bad sign.
I expect the judge to be hand picked for your destruction.
It would not surprise me at all if the judge on the day is a muslim himself.

We still have room for maneuvre even in that situation with plenty left to play for (even during the hearing).

With each and every point of contention we must avoid making the same mistake as them and only considering one outcome.
We must have considered every single possible turn of events and be sure we know how to capitalise on it and punish them in some way.

For this reason my prepared scripts are numerous and it is not clear which ones I will need to use until we see which way they jump.

We can reduce the likelihood of you being prosecuted further even without a discharge or variation being ordered by the court.
Even if the ASBO is not discharged. Even if no variation is ordered on the prohibitions.
If the court can be forced to give straightforward answers of “yes” or “no” when asked whether particualr activities are prohibited by the ASBO then we can gain a guarantee of certain rights for you that though you have them in law already, you demonstrably don’t have them in practice.

We can tip their hand by reminding them of relavant legislation which they have been previously flouting. Forcing them to concede that you have certain rights in law.

So you can leave the court freer than you entered it while appearing (superficially) to lose your appeal against this ASBO.

Strategic gains we can expect from fighting the case
From a strategic perspective we can reduce the capacity of the CPS to bring such cases by forcing them to take more care in the preparation of cases.
This would reduce the number of cases they can prepare with the same resources.

We can also reduce their capacity to prosecute by forcing the court to hear the defence instead of ruling everything as inadmissable.

If cases take ten times as much court time when skillfully contested then that means there will be only a tenth of the number of cases going forward unless they throw more resources at this.

The fewer the cases we have to fight the more of our resources we can devote to each case.
The more punishing each case can become for them.

Strategic gains from our other activities.

We probably won’t manage to get the ASBO discharged or even get a variation ordered on it but they might get such a surprise from the pounding we give them in terms of criticism and protests that they back away and give up on you.

This should not be seen a massive source of hope for you. But certainly they are more wary of bothering people who have a support group that they know full well is going to use their actions as a stick to beat them with.

If not that then at least you are drawing their fire and squandering their resources while a lot more of us are politically rushing them from other directions at the same time.

I am saying this in the hope of reminding you that however much of an unfair beatdown this injustice might seem like – they are still not having it all their own way and your sacrifice is a necessary and helpful part of the struggle.

If we lose the case badly then as a consolation prize I offer you my attempt at flipping one or two Labour seats. We will pick one or two narrow Labour majorities where we have supporters and then leaflet poor areas informing voters about what the court has done and asking them to stop voting Labour or Conservative. We move them to UKIP or For Britain or Britain First.
Whoever is standing against the establishment parties in that area.

We haven’t studied the numbers yet so there is no concrete plan.
We can use what happened to you to generally change opinions but also to target two constituencies in particular and try to flip those seats in the commons. We leaflet using legal protection afforded to political parties informing voters that the court flouted the law in your case and that the police perjured themselves repeatedly while the judge knowingly ignored it.

We will beg people to stop voting Labour and start voting UKIP or For Britain.
We will target poor estates and synchronise different leafleting to make it hard for the other side to react effectively..

They are alreeady so busy with us that they have decided to not bother investigating stuff like burglary, assault and rape so I would say they are already stretched.

Advice for conduct while the ASBO is in place

Encouraging or disseminating politically contraversial material of any type to myself and others

As I have already stated, you are protected in law when it comes to any activity where it is related to the reporting of legal cases.
RRHA2006 excludes it being used in section 29K.

It is possible that they will try to arrest you for it anyway.
You should first present the arresting officer with a printed copy of that paragraph from the act.
He will probably ignore it so then you just phone me from the police station.

I don’t know the procedure yet but just political activism using their illegality as propaganda might well get you released.

My gut feeling is they will not arrest you for flouting your ASBO until after the full hearing so that they can say you have had ample opportunity to contest the ASBO in court.

Otherwise, how come you aren’t already in prison?
Every word I hear you say is a breach of that ASBO in their feverish imaginations.

Flying your flag
I have no doubt that the intention when drafting this ASBO was that you merely possessing an England flag or Union Jack would be enough to arrest you.

But when pressed on this point they have refused to confirm or deny this.
The judge is compelled to instruct the prosecuter to answer our questions until you the defendent understand the conditions.

By failing to do that the judge has given you legal grounds to contest them arresting you over the flag.

In addition I think they will realise at some point soon that if they do that we will use that as propaganda to slap them around the heads with so they’ll retreat on this in my estimation.

We have ticked all the boxes covering you for flying a flag.
I have even asked a senior member of the Conservative party about that prohibition and he insists it would not apply to England flags or Union Jacks but that is just his assumption.

They have been given every opportunity to clarify this matter and have refused..

I’m not sure how to handle them arresting you for this.

I initially considered the idea of a phone blitz as a contingency plan for this situation.
That would comprise a series of expressions of disappointment from various members of the public.
If everyone who was unhappy with them rang them to say so they’d be extremely busy people.
I dismissed the idea because the police is an important service that everybody needs.
Not that they actually do any real police work even with their phones working but let’s not give them extra excuses for being so useless.

They would have tried to use MTA2003 to prosecute us for that and for once we might actually be guilty so there’s another reason not to do that.

Our main battlefield for fighting this issue is on social media and on the door step.

My advice: Keep flying your flag.
They have ignore it thus far.
They refuse to be drawn on the matter.
Nobody is going to vote for politicians who preside over us being arrested for flying England flags.

I can remember two instances where this issue has been something that has worked in our favour in the past. Videos of people being arrested for holding England flags get a lot of shares and cause much outrage among the citizenry.
If these dumbasses want to try for third time lucky then we should invite them to bring it on.

If you must get arrested then please let it be for this.

Other
It would be a good idea for us to think about what other activities need to be considered.
I feel a lot of your books might be seized by them and used as evidence of you breaching your ASBO.

Even best selling books by perfectly respectable people could get you imprisoned.
My advice: Don’t give up your books.
If you owning those books is causing alarm to someone or making them feel harrassed or if the court feels it is an activity that wouold lead to you doing something that would cause alarm, distress , blah blah then you can be locked up in their minds.

If they arrest you for that it is ammunition against them.

There are other things too.

Prediction of outcome

Composition of the trial
This is merely my best guess at what is going to happen with no experience in this area of law.

The trial is scheduled for a full day which means our start time is going to be early in the morning.
The judge and the prosecuter are only really planning on spending about one and a half hours on this and imagine they are going to have an early dart while getting paid for a full day.

They get most of a day off at the cost of you getting a fair hearing.

There’s a very good chance things aren’t going to turn out the way they are expecting and I think we will finish sometime mid afternoon but it can be very short or very long depending on how they react.
It could be over in 15 minutes (for good or bad reasons).

We can’t present a long monologue.
If we did that they would simply cut me short and your defence would never be heard.

Our case is a great number of small components that will be slid into opportunities created by the prosecution and we will rely entirely on their own evidence to argue the injustice of this.
We aim to prove their numerous perjuries.
We aim to point out the cynical ambiguity of the prohibitions and the consistent refusal to clarify them.

We aim to reduce their estimation of the gains they can expect to achieve.
This might help our chances of the judge discharging it.

Without wishing to denegrate your contribution to the movement we can find another speaker in 5 seconds flat so even they must realise that the cost of imprisoning you has zero direct impact on us as a movement.
We are only reacting so vigorously because we are angry about the injustice and we don’t want to wait until it is our turn.

This is principally seen by them as being useful in frightening the rest of us off.
I need to convince them that it is not having any such effect on us.
That there is a long queue of us behind you who are also happy to take a turn in prison.

What to do if arrested during this time.
Remain calm.
Show relavant law and legal guidance pertaining to why they shouldn’t be arresting you.
Try to prepare your freinds and family so they stay put and witness everything and don’t start agreeing with the police in an effort to curry favour and seem reasonable.
Anyone who is unreliable should walk away when trouble starts.
They will bury you even deeper in trouble if they start accidentally motivating the police with confidence building such as that.
Some help is worse than no help whatsoever.
The police should be reminded of how new and unusual their actions and views are.
Nobody must be reassuring them by pretending like this is the most normal thing in the world.
Like as if it seems totally reasonable to arrest you for possession of a flag or for encouraging or permitting someone else to possess a flag.

It is not normal.
It is not OK.

How I need you to act in court
I need you to look perfectly calm and at ease the whole time.
There is a chance that it is going to be discharged.
Even if that doesn’t happen it might not ever be enforced.

If you compare the mild punishment you face in short term imprisonment to the sort of fate they could face in a few years then you are a lot safer being the defendant than the prosecutor or judge.
I would not want to swap places with them if I was you given the way the political tide is moving.
At least one third of the population want these people publicly executed for what they are doing.
If that percentage keeps rising the way it has been doing then the dam is certainly going to burst at some point in the next few years.
The polling numbers (even looking at the latest stats issued by Hope not Hate) prove this rising tide of anger is certanly a reality.
Hope not Hate claim we are 40% of the population now (based on a survey conducted by YouGov). I would say 35%.
Another survey late last year had us at 47%.

Everyone agrees we were a tiny minority a few short years ago.
Everyone agrees we are still on the rise even now with the police and courts pulling out all the stops. The few of us who are immune to career sabotage or some other penalty are still enough to form huge crowds in the many protests that the media are now hiding from the public.

Another year like the last year and they are going to start realising what is coming their way.
Perhaps that thought will help put this into a better perspective for you.
There is no point in making threats towards them at this point.
We first need reality to dawn on them.
Prematurely threatening them with specific criminal charges will result in laughter from them at this point in time.

Imagine you are sat on a train watching the scenery go by.
Maintain that attitude the whole time no matter what anyone says.

If we get this discharged then part of the reason will be that it doesn’t appear to be having the intended effect. They would insist on this staying in place no matter how well we argued against it if they felt it would deliver a strategic advantage to them.

I will be leaving it until late on before pointing out that we have a long line of volunteers behind you all happy to take a turn in prison.
This claim will seem more plausible if you and I both seem perfectly laid back about the whole thing. Even where he threatens me with contempt of court.
We show no big reaction to it..

This will move the judge’s assessed value of this a bit.

Taking a couple of Labour constituencies via leafleting
I have come up with a way of leafleting the public that is protected by law so they just can’t do a thing about it and I’ll give them a copy of what we will be handing out rather than saying stuff about the judge behind his back.
We need to be able to give accurate projections of distribution sizes as well as current polling figures for the political constitutes
We don’t simply pick your home area.
Instead we pick places where the Labour majority is a bit thin and thus we have a realistic chance of flipping a seat.

I need to be polite but still make a clear threat.
“If you do this, we do that”.
We need to produce and distribute enough leaflets for us to reach and convert enough Labour voters and none voters.
This means our richest pickings are poor council estates.
Choosing our demographic with care reduces how many leaflets we need to do.

Your schedule of behaviour.
There are a great number of things mentioned in your schedule of behaviour which are perfectly legal activities where the police have no business being interest.

On top of that they can be proven to be lying time and time again in a futile attempt at making your behaviour sound illegal.

Your schedule is so thickly laiden with perjury that I think I may have mistaken laziness for stupidity when I first started looking at it.
Whatever the reason for all the blatant lying, it helps us more than than it helps them if we are allowed to speak.
Even the inference of Alarm and distress being caused puts them on the spot if forced to explain how.
Not as juicy a lie as my two favourite humdingers in there but still it paints a dark picture of the prosecution.

It is beyond reasonable doubt that it is deliberately misleading the court relying on nobody paying attention to the evidence which accompanies it.
It is just too strong a pattern for it to occur by chance.

This breaks down into 8 defence components that vary in length between short and easy to explain in less than one minute to more complex and lengthy accusations lasting several minutes.

In each instance we must prepublish our accusation and open by pointing this out to them.
My rationale is that on the one hand they have no interest in hearing what we have to say to them in your defence.
but on the other hand they will be interested in knowing what we have been saying to others about them.

We have to juggle the words around so that instead of each point being a defence of you it is instead an attack on them.
Where they are the topic of conversation they are interested.
Where you are the topic of conversation they are not going to listen even if they have to pretend to listen.

The only way to peak their interest in what we say is by saying it to third parties with no apparent care as to whether they know what we have to say.

Clarification of prohibitions
We need to request an example of the application of each and every prohibition.
Prior to that we need to present them with a breakdown untangled from their amalgamated prohibitions.

I have not become familliar with the procedure so I know by simple guesswork what the different parts of the trial will be but not what the order will be.
It would be better if clarification of the prohibitions was dealt with before we looked at anything else but I think they might not cover it at the start.
Whenever they do cover it I will again remind them of the ambiguity of it and our desire to question the relevance or justification for each prohibition.
This will result in many variations simply because the prohibitions make no logical sense or else the prosecution can’t come up with an example of application.
.

Chances of a subsequent custodial sentence
Obviously if the ASBO is not discharged then your percentage likelihood of imprisonment goes up from my current estimate of 10% to 40%
…to a more pessimistic 12.5% to 50% chance.

Chances of other outcomes
This is very difficult to predict.
I must admit I have very little relevant experience with this area of law and have not ploughed through enough case law to be able to seize on every opportunity.

Prepare for a stint in prison but don’t assume it is a certainty..
Maybe somewhere between 10% and 40% chance.
I’m sure it is 100% chance in the minds of the police and the judge and this is merely a formality in their estimation.
I reckon it would have been 100% chance of getting sent down if you had hired a regular lawyer.

The lesson we should learn here is that we’re better off getting our own people trained up as paralegals now.
This allows us to fight a hundred times as many battles as crowd funding professionals would have allowed.

Definitely don’t write off our chances at this point.
They have complete control over so much but still stupidity is a bad weakness to have and they have it lot of it.

There is a small chance that the prosecution will withdraw the ASBO or apply for it to be discharged (I am not sure exactly what the procedure is) prior to the full hearing due to us reacting strongly and publicise all their perjury and other flouting of the law.

We need to seize on this case and use it to inflict more harm on them than they can potentially inflict on us. As a movement we lose a speaker and we have more than we need so it is a zero cost to us.
Sorry for not sounding very appreciative of your immense efforts but we are heaving with people now and they are joining a lot faster than they are getting arrested.

On a personal level it makes others very angry to see you punished.
Also, we know if we let this slide without a push back then we are next.
So I for one am going to do everything in my power to turn your case into a bad decision on their part and I’m sure many others will feel the same way too.
It will help us recruit more people.

We are already recruiting new people into the anti Islamic moverment at a far higher rate than they dissuading people.
We are winning the war of atrition and they are pulling out almost all the stops at this point.

Putting us in prison for 15 years for watching videos is a bluff.
Do the maths and it is obvious that they have very little prison capacity compared to how many of us would openly flout such an arrogant and tyrannical move by that stupid bitch we have as a home secretary.

Let’s say 20% chance they back off prior to the hearing.
Might be 10% or 30%.
I don’t know.

There is a chance of it being discharged during your hearing.
It’s not likely but not impossible either considering the number of instances of perjury I can point to and the number of exemptions that have been ignored thus far in your dealings with the police and courts.

So that leaves us with a 40% to 80% chance of the ASBO standing.
Even in that scenario it might be with a variation ordered on it.
Any clarification will effectively reduce the scope of the order.

It is then not certain if they will act on it or if they will pull their horns in.

I am fairly sure they didn’t envisage the trouble they are now facing when they were drafting this clumsy nonsense they present as evidence so they might change their minds when aware they have wrongly predicted costs and benefits.

I’m not a lawyer myself but I can appreciate that this case has ramifications for freedom above and beyond a typical open and shut case of this type. Please help John Banks and the cause of freedom in whatever way you can, and turn up in Doncaster on 04 July 2018 to demonstrate your support.

Tim Burton

The Roots of Islamic Anti-Semitism – and why we must fight to eliminate it from our country

Image result for jews

This is reprinted from an article by Robert Spencer in Jihad Watch – and I am reproducing it here in its entirety because Anti-Semitism in Europe has to be stopped if we are not to see another Holocaust at the hands of barbaric Muslims following the commands of the Qur’an – specifically concerning our Jewish friends, who judging by their observable behaviour, have every intention of living harmoniously with the rest of humanity – which is more than can be said for most Muslims.

Anti-Semitism in Europe is at levels not seen since the heyday of Nazi Germany, and is growing more savage by the moment. In February 2018, i24 News reported that “two French Jewish brothers were briefly abducted and abused by a group of men in a Paris suburb in an incident that ended with the brothers being beaten and attacked with a wood saw.” This is the new Europe, the same as the old Europe, because of Muslim immigration: the attackers were “a group of men described as having a Middle Eastern appearance.”

A group of men having a Middle Eastern appearance would have every reason, by their own lights, to abduct, beat, and attempt to mutilate two random Jews. The Qur’an depicts the Jews as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the well-being of the Muslims. They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims (5:82); as fabricating things and falsely ascribing them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181); claiming that Allah’s power is limited (5:64); loving to listen to lies (5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13); disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people (3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161); slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly (4:53); being transformed into apes and pigs for breaking the Sabbath (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166); and more.

The classic Qur’anic commentators not do not mitigate the Qur’an’s words against Jews, but only add fuel to the fire. Ibn Kathir explained Qur’an 2:61 (“They were covered with humiliation and misery; they drew on themselves the wrath of Allah”) this way: “This Ayah [verse] indicates that the Children of Israel were plagued with humiliation, and that this will continue, meaning that it will never cease. They will continue to suffer humiliation at the hands of all who interact with them, along with the disgrace that they feel inwardly.” Another Middle Ages commentator of lingering influence, Abdallah Ibn Umar al-Baidawi, explains the same verse this way: “The Jews are mostly humiliated and wretched either of their own accord, or out of coercion of the fear of having their jizya [punitive tax] doubled.”

Ibn Kathir notes Islamic traditions that predict that at the end of the world, “the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah), and the Muslims, along with ‘Isa [Jesus], son of Mary, will kill the Jews.” The idea in Islam that the end times will be marked by Muslims killing Jews comes from the prophet Muhammad himself, who said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. ‘O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.’” This is, not unexpectedly, a favorite motif among contemporary jihadists.

Not just contemporary jihadists, but modern-day mainstream Islamic authorities take these passages seriously. The former Grand Sheikh of Al-Azhar, Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, who was the most respected cleric in the world among Sunni Muslims, called Jews “the enemies of Allah, descendants of apes and pigs.” The late Saudi sheikh Abd al-Rahman al-Sudayyis, imam of the principal mosque in the holiest city in Islam, Mecca, said in a sermon that Jews are “the scum of the human race, the rats of the world, the violators of pacts and agreements, the murderers of the prophets, and the offspring of apes and pigs.”

Another Saudi sheikh, Ba’d bin Abdallah al-Ajameh al-Ghamidi, made the connection explicit: “The current behavior of the brothers of apes and pigs, their treachery, violation of agreements, and defiling of holy places … is connected with the deeds of their forefathers during the early period of Islam–which proves the great similarity between all the Jews living today and the Jews who lived at the dawn of Islam.”

All this shows that leading Muslim authorities approach the Qur’an not as a document rooted in history, but as a blueprint for understanding the world today. Indeed, it is the primary blueprint for such understanding, and yet the one most persistently ignored by authorities. That’s why those authorities keep misunderstanding the rising problem of Islamic anti-Semitism, and are woefully ill-equipped to deal with it.

We owe it to humanity, not just to Jews themselves, who so often are the “canaries in the coalmine” when it comes to predicting institutional discrimination in society. If we allow Muslims to get away with this unjust persecution of the Jews, then Christians and all other non-Muslims will be next in the cross-hairs of the most oppressive, intolerant and totalitarian ideology on the face of the planet.

Tim Burton – with acknowledgements to Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch