In order to prevent “radicalisation” in the UK, has the time come to take every single Muslim child into care?

   Top cop gets it (almost)

Almost four years ago, in March 2014, in his position as London Mayor, Boris Johnson suggested that children in danger of radicalisation should be removed from their parents. He was castigated at the time by the Muslim Council of Britain, who warned that his remarks would inflame anti-Muslim feeling (like pretty much everything else does.)

He said (and I quote):

“The law should obviously treat radicalisation as a form of child abuse.”

“It is the strong view of many of those involved in counter-terrorism that there should be a clearer legal position, so that those children who are being turned into potential killers or suicide bombers can be removed into care – for their own safety and for the safety of the public.”

Now a senior police officer, Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley, has suggested virtually the same thing – that children of convicted terrorists should be removed from their parents, in the same way that the children of convicted paedophiles should be removed from their parents.

and also crucially added this statement:

….. If you know parents [who] believe that people of their faith or their belief, should hate everybody else and grow up to kill people, [then] for me those things are equally wicked environments to expose children to.

To be fair to both Boris Johnson and Mark Rowley, it should go without saying that the laudable goal of protecting children should be paramount in every case where there is a risk of them being exposed to a “wicked environment.” However, the logical consequences on following through on such a policy would have ramifications that have almost certainly not been considered by either official in their safeguarding capacity.

You can’t get much more of a “wicked environment” where innocent children are exposed to the core Islamic concept of Al-Walaa wal-Baraa.

This concept, based as it is on on Koran 60:4, instructs all devout Muslims – without exception – that they must have hatred and enmity for everyone and everything non-Muslim. This is not something that a Muslim may “cherry-pick” – it is mainstream Islamic teaching, red in tooth and claw. I challenge anyone reading this article to find a clearer example of a “wicked environment” in which to bring up children.

There is therefore a good argument to be made for a pro-active intervention in almost every case where an innocent child is in danger of being taught just this one core Islamic concept before they are old enough to question it and weigh up the consequences for themselves, and certainly a policy of pro-active intervention should apply if they are British citizens.

Admittedly this policy would put a strain on the capabilities of the police and the social services, and there would be a few grumblings from the Muslim community that would undoubtedly have to be handled in a robust manner, but as they say, no pain no gain. It would have to be worth a try considering that the alternative will almost certainly be civil war and blood on the streets within a generation or two as the Muslim demographic in this country reaches a tipping point. We owe it to our own children, as well as the innocent children currently in the care of Muslim parents, to act now.

Perhaps those officials and others sharing the same misguided mindset of political correctness, multiculturalism and diversity might also reflect that almost every other counter-terrorism policy in this country has proved to be a complete failure, a situation which could and should have been foreseen, as those policies have been based on fantasy and wishful thinking rather than reality.

Don’t take my word for it – I strongly recommend that every non-Muslim should read, comprehend and inwardly digest (as my teachers used to say) every word in The Aqeedah of the Salaf.

We in the enlightened Western world base most of our moral and ethical judgements on Judaeo-Christian teachings, which have served us well over the past two millennia, and which are one hundred and eighty degrees opposed to most of the moral and ethical values of the Islamic world. Any form of child abuse is just plain wrong, and teaching the core concepts of Islam to innocent children before they are old enough to make up their own minds is child abuse beyond the shadow of a doubt.

Tim Burton

So who was really responsible for the “radicalisation” of Darren Osborne?

    Man with a van

On Friday 02 February, Darren Osborne was sentenced at Woolwich Crown Court to a minimum term of 43 years for murder and attempted murder by driving a hired van into a group of Muslims as they were gathered on the street by the notorious Finsbury Park Mosque in London.

During the trial, the Crown Prosecution Service and the mainstream media – including the BBC – went out of their way to smear Tommy Robinson (the former EDL leader and now a respected journalist for The Rebel Media) as having been responsible for “radicalising” or “brainwashing” Darren Osborne to commit violence against Muslims, when in fact the truth was completely different.

The BBC completely refused to admit the possibility that their own programs and documentaries, including the harrowing documentary “Three Girls” which dwelt on the phenomenon of Islamic grooming gangs, could have played a part in Darren Osborne’s “radicalisation”, perhaps an unusual position to take when Darren Osborne emphasised in court that this particular documentary had in fact affected him greatly and had played a significant part in his subsequently murderous actions.

The judge in the trial opined that Darren Osborne’s actions amounted to terrorism, which no doubt contributed to the severity of the sentence, but no account was taken of the fact that a very toxic environment has been created by the media, our social services, our police forces and our political elites who have repeatedly turned a blind eye to the extraordinarily bad behaviour of all too many Muslims in our society, which taken as a whole, constitutes an existential threat to national security – and, if it remains unaddressed, will ultimately lead to the destruction not only of our own society but also of our entire Judaeo-Christian civilisation through our tolerance of the intolerant.

This “extraordinarily bad behaviour”, to put it mildly, involves numerous instances of violence, sexual assault, intimidation, and multiple terror attacks from the followers of the most intolerant totalitarian ideology on the planet. It is obvious to even the most untrained eye that there is a problem with Islam – and a significant proportion of Muslims – that is not being addressed by those people with whom we have a social / societal contract to keep us safe and secure in exchange for our paying taxes.

Given this toxic environment, where the situation is getting worse every week and nothing is being done about it, is it so surprising that somebody, somewhere will decide that they have nothing left to lose, and lash out in the murderous way that Darren Osborne did? I am not condoning his actions in any way, in fact I consider his actions to be entirely counter-productive insofar as they give ammunition to those who would perpetuate the myth of “far-right extremism.” But the primary responsibility lies with those who created the toxic environment in the first place.

They do say that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter, but my personal view is that Darren Osborne does not fall into either of these categories. A terrorist / freedom fighter does what he does, slaughtering innocent people and treating them as justifiable collateral damage, as long as he is in pursuit of a political or religious goal such as the overthrow of the existing social order, but what Darren Osborne did could be much better described as vigilantism, where someone takes the law into their own hands out of desperation because those in authority who should be keeping us safe have abdicated their responsibilities.

The shameful attempts to shift the blame onto Tommy Robinson and so-called “far-right extremists” – who are for the most part no more than concerned citizens and patriots who are alarmed by the whitewashing of our mainstream media and the inaction of our police forces, social services and political elites – simply show how desperate the forces of political correctness and multiculturalism are becoming in the face of increasing awareness by the rest of us of the dangers resulting from the unrestricted proliferation of this intolerant and totalitarian political ideology.

As Ayn Rand once said – “You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.” The chickens are coming home to roost.

Tim Burton